“We are not afraid of an open, fair, and honest debate. If the supporters of the Covenant had a stronger case, perhaps they wouldn’t be either.”
In the meantime, some dyspeptic Canadian goes a little bit further in this post at the official NACC blog, Comprehensive Unity.
And why is it that so much of the pro-Covenant case coming out of the establishment reminds me of this:
Dolores Umbridge: I am sorry, dear, but to question my practices is to question the Ministry, and by extension, the Minister himself. I am a tolerant woman, but the one thing I will not stand for is disloyalty.
Minerva McGonagall: Disloyalty?
Dolores Umbridge: Things at Hogwarts are far worse than I feared.
1 comment:
Well, as they say in Texas, "Bless their hearts." At this point it isn't the covenant itself anymore, but its factor as a Token indicating support of Rowan and the Communion Idea that is at stake. The folks are spinning wool for the Emperor's New Rochet.
Post a Comment